Everyone is different, therefore there are as many variables to a job. Each person comes with their own skillset and personality - that's why personal support is required to maximise capabilities. Ergonomics (the study of working conditions' influence on the effectiveness of  task completion) looks at both organizational and human aspects contributing to job performance. This includes everything from workplace culture to the optimum height of a desk.

Workplace culture builds a foreground for safety, wellbeing and performance, which is why ergonomics - human factors engineering, in other words - should not be excluded in improvement efforts. Feeling safe can equal increased productivity, for example, by reducing the stress levels of the personnel. Moreover, being properly equipped and providing regular breaks can significantly reduce errors and increase efficiency - benefiting the individual and the business.

Download 5 Methods of Root Cause Analysis for EHS Incidents

My tough nut to crack this week is looking at why organizations need to consider workplace human factors.

What are human factors?

"Human factors refer to environmental, organisational and job factors, and human and individual characteristics, which influence behaviour at work in a way which can affect health and safety" Health and Safety Executive

In their commitment to a safe environment, organizations should educate their employees on work-influencing factors like fatigue and situation awareness to facilitate an effective run of the workplace. Taking a proactive stand on this means listening to the human characteristics behind the incidents, rather than just the data.

Let's look to Netflix for an example of a human factor influenced incident. In Breaking Bad, a plane crash is caused by a staff member's emotions: he is mourning over his daughter, leading him to give the wrong instructions to a commercial airplane causing two planes to crash mid-air. Human factors can have catastrophic consequences.

How can we reduce human errors? It's argued that clear and precise communication, regular retraining of work skills, and increasing awareness can help.

The reasons behind our actions

Risk prevention is not limited to reacting to signals; we must also understand our reactions. By digging deeper into the human mind, we can understand how we learn and remember, absorb new information and observe the environment.

Sensation, perception & response

We first process events with our senses, which then “forward” information to our working memory.

Sensation is not, however, equal to perception. We each “give” a different meaning to a sensation depending on our personal past experiences. Now, imagine the amount of different perceptions 100 people can have on a sole event.

The following step to perception is response, and as each perception is different, each response will be too.

There could be no response after perception, but the information is learned by our working memory, which then can be further transmitted into our long-term memory.

Working memory vs. long- term memory

Working memory has a limited capacity - new information must be used promptly. It's when we learn and train in a subject it is possible to transfer information from working memory to long-term memory.

However, it can get complicated. Not all memories are remembered, mainly due to interference  - when a new piece of information is input too soon leading to other information being “wiped out”. Interference can also cause the removal of old memory if the new memory is too similar. A changed security code on a door is a workplace example of a new piece of information taking over an old one.

Human factors in decision making

From the initial perception, our mind finds a way to respond to the experience. Keeping this is mind, we can better understand our workplace actions in addressing  issues.

A very relevant example is decision-making. We all have to make decisions at work, requiring an understanding of new information and an analysis of old knowledge. In other words, we use our memory to fill in the “missing cues” of the situation.

However, we must be wary of this as our memory can be prone to errors, therefore a good decision maker is able to recognize the key information they need to know before making a the call.

Human factors can influence the decision making process.

Fatigue and stress are human factors

How much information do we really absorb once the clock hits 5pm? Or, how well can you consider all relevant points when given 30 seconds to make a decision?

Leadership involves decision-making, and sometimes decisions can impact hundreds of lives. When the captain of the Titanic decided to increase speed, he relied on the current statistics and good weather, but if he used his previous experience and knowledge to fill in the “missing cues” of short visibility and icebergs, the accident may have been prevented.

In a big accident like the Titanic, panic comes into play. Panic easily clouds our judgement, sometimes resulting in unsafe events.

How fatigue can cause unsafe events

Let's say a worker, Jim, is a project manager on a construction site. He overlooks 150 people and participates in decision-making on a daily basis. The project is going well, with no reported incidents so far.

Personnel have been given the chance to work extra weekend shifts, but some workers are already working their 15th consecutive day. Every morning, Jim checks each site has the necessary workforce and a team leader. An experienced personnel was to supervise a team with a new member, who had been called in to fill in a sick leave.

The team leader, who is exhausted from working and overwhelmed by home problems, forgot to inform the new colleague about a safety switch. This triggered a risky situation with an overflow of electricity causing an employee to suffer an electric shock.

When deciding what remediation actions to take, it's important to take a good look at the case: Whose mistake was this? Should the new guy have known that a general safety switch was the norm, or was it the team leader’s responsibility since he was in charge of the new member?

It's more complex than that. First of all, Jim allowed his staff to work extra hours without monitoring their wellbeing - the root cause of this incident. The team leader was not in a calm state of mind due to excessive working and worrying.

The work/life balance

It is commonly stated that work should be separated from home and vice versa; however, how do you delete financial stress from your mind when it is directly connected with work? Workers should have support these situations, every one of us are a safety risk when too tired or stressed.

Tiredness at work should not be taken lightly. EHS Today reported that 40% of US workers suffer from fatigue -  not only influencing performance and safety, but also putting our health at risk. Miwa Sado, a Japanese political reporter, passed away at 31 years after having worked 159 hours overtime at her last month at work. Death by overwork happens so often in Japan there is a word for it: “karoshi”. So, what should organisations be doing?

How to combat human factors at work

Organizations can improve staff competency by organizing training in-line with cognitive abilities. Teaching one task at a time, without interruptions or other new information input, workers can better digest and acquire the information.

Regular re-training maintains the skill level and keeps forgetfulness at bay. Despite training certificates’ expiry date, skill competency can significantly decrease before then.  With safety certificates especially, it's risky business to rely on acquired skills used once in a blue moon.

Measuring fatigue and other human factors is a more challenging task. Companies can educate their employees about the risks involved in working long hours, and pass on non-technical skills: situation awareness, communication and decision-making. These tools increase awareness and enables a safe and efficient working manner.

An open work culture can contribute to healthy workplace in which issues such as tiredness or stress could be raised without fear of dismissal or judgement. The staff could also have access to regular consultations with medical staff.

Tackling fatigue is challenging, because its effects vary. There are guides on how to implement a fatigue management plan, but tracking simple statistics like working hours and capping overtime can make a difference. EHS software that integrates with a HR program can be incredibly useful in picking up safety lagging and leading indicators.

Workplace design should not be forgotten. Tools, work spaces and work stations should be designed ergonomically, with noise and general disorganization kept to a minimum. Human factors engineering can minimize human errors and maximize productivity, and also improve safety performance. When planning training, consider our capacity to learn and remember.

Understanding human factors and nourishing a healthy work culture is the key to a better performing workplace.

5 Methods of Root Cause Analysis for EHS Incidents

Understand the basics of 5 of the most popular RCA techniques, with a how-to guide, an example, and pros and cons of each. Root Cause Analysis is only one block of an incident investigation building, but if you want to start with a strong foundation in the practice, download this whitepaper for help.

Read guide »

A Copenhagen Business School graduate with a MA in International Business Communication, Tytti joined the Pro-Sapien marketing department in 2017 and brings a wide range of experience to the team – not to mention the ability to fluently speak three languages, Finnish (native), English and Spanish. Outside of business Tytti is an avid gymnast having competed at international level in the Aesthetic Group Gymnastics Championships, and has lived in Finland, France, Argentina, Spain, Denmark and now the United Kingdom. As the Graduate Marketing Executive Tytti coordinates Pro-Sapien’s social outreach and blog content, and can be reached at tytti.rekosuo@pro-sapien.com.

Take part in the conversation